Preview image

East Carolina at UAB

Final

ECU77% UAB23%

Missed TEMPO had ECU by 11.3. UAB won by 13.

Forecast and result

Forecast and market
MeasureTEMPOMarket lineFinal
MarginTEMPOECU by 11.37.1 pts toward ECU vs the lineMarket lineECU by 4.3Opened: ECU by 5.5FinalUAB by 13.0
Total pointsTEMPO50.63.1 pts over the lineMarket line47.5Opened: 51.3Final47

Market median saved Oct 13, 2026Grading

Forecast results

Straight upSpreadTotal
Margin miss
24.3 points
Total miss
3.6 points
Market margin miss
17.3 points
Market total miss
0.5 points

Actual game measures

How each offense performed, based on the plays in our records.

Actual offensive measures for both teams
MeasureECUUAB
Points per drive1.421.45
Finishing drives3.403.20
EPA/play−0.07−0.08
Success rate36.5%36.5%
Rush success32.6%40.7%
Pass success46.2%33.3%
Yards per play4.205.03
Explosive plays9.5%17.5%
Havoc9.5%15.9%
Pace74.063.0

Compared with opponent. Lower havoc is better; pace and close values stay neutral. Results through Tue, Oct 20, 2026, 8:25 AM ET. — means no measured value.

Series

Head to head

Ratings this season

Each team’s strength at every cutoff in this saved update, with 90% ranges.

90% range

For information and entertainment, not betting advice. TEMPO is independent of the NCAA, the College Football Playoff, conferences, schools and sportsbooks. Team and conference names and logos are trademarks of their owners.

TEMPO v12Updated Oct 20, 2026Data from CollegeFootballData.com