Preview image

Memphis at Tulane

Final

MEM68% TULN32%

Missed TEMPO had MEM by 7.4. TULN won by 14.

Forecast and result

Forecast and market
MeasureTEMPOMarket lineFinal
MarginTEMPOMEM by 7.40.6 pts toward MEM vs the lineMarket lineMEM by 6.8Opened: MEM by 7.0FinalTULN by 14.0
Total pointsTEMPO49.64.7 pts under the lineMarket line54.3Opened: 53.5Final48

Market median saved Oct 13, 2026Grading

Forecast results

Straight upSpreadTotal
Margin miss
21.4 points
Total miss
1.6 points
Market margin miss
20.8 points
Market total miss
6.3 points

Actual game measures

How each offense performed, based on the plays in our records.

Actual offensive measures for both teams
MeasureMEMTULN
Points per drive1.131.64
Finishing drives1.703.83
EPA/play−0.36−0.23
Success rate41.3%28.3%
Rush success50.0%19.4%
Pass success37.5%43.5%
Yards per play5.205.02
Explosive plays12.5%10.0%
Havoc16.3%13.3%
Pace81.060.0

Compared with opponent. Lower havoc is better; pace and close values stay neutral. Results through Tue, Oct 20, 2026, 8:25 AM ET. — means no measured value.

Series

Head to head

Ratings this season

Each team’s strength at every cutoff in this saved update, with 90% ranges.

90% range

For information and entertainment, not betting advice. TEMPO is independent of the NCAA, the College Football Playoff, conferences, schools and sportsbooks. Team and conference names and logos are trademarks of their owners.

TEMPO v12Updated Oct 20, 2026Data from CollegeFootballData.com