Preview image

Pittsburgh at Boston College

Final

PITT76% BC24%

Missed TEMPO had PITT by 11.0. BC won by 6.

Forecast and result

Forecast and market
MeasureTEMPOMarket lineFinal
MarginTEMPOPITT by 11.04.5 pts toward PITT vs the lineMarket linePITT by 6.5Opened: PITT by 6.5FinalBC by 6.0
Total pointsTEMPO48.24.4 pts over the lineMarket line43.8Opened: 45.3Final48

Market median saved Oct 13, 2026Grading

Forecast results

Straight upSpreadTotal
Margin miss
17.0 points
Total miss
0.2 points
Market margin miss
12.5 points
Market total miss
4.3 points

Actual game measures

How each offense performed, based on the plays in our records.

Actual offensive measures for both teams
MeasurePITTBC
Points per drive——
Finishing drives——
EPA/play0.010.20
Success rate48.4%38.8%
Rush success59.5%35.1%
Pass success34.6%44.8%
Yards per play5.144.85
Explosive plays7.8%11.9%
Havoc10.9%19.4%
Pace64.068.0

Compared with opponent. Lower havoc is better; pace and close values stay neutral. Results through Tue, Oct 20, 2026, 8:25 AM ET. — means no measured value.

Series

Head to head

Ratings this season

Each team’s strength at every cutoff in this saved update, with 90% ranges.

90% range

For information and entertainment, not betting advice. TEMPO is independent of the NCAA, the College Football Playoff, conferences, schools and sportsbooks. Team and conference names and logos are trademarks of their owners.

TEMPO v12Updated Oct 20, 2026Data from CollegeFootballData.com